Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Concrete and abstract visualizations in history learning tasks|
Van Boxtel, Carla
Kirschner, Paul A.
|Publisher:||British Journal of Educational Psychology|
|Abstract:||A study was conducted to determine the effects of tasks with abstract and/or concrete visualizations on the learning of historical developments and structures. The hypothesis was that students receiving visualizations would learn and retain more historical knowledge and concepts than those not receiving visualizations. First-year pupils in vocational middle school (N ¼ 104) worked in randomly assigned pairs. After reading a text, the pairs were given a learning task in one of four conditions: Textual, Concrete visualized, Abstract visualized, and Combined. Post-test and retention test results showed no significant differences. There were some significant differences on the evaluation questionnaire. Combining text and different types of visualizations in learning tasks does not necessarily enhance history learning. Possible explanations given are the ecological setting, the semiotics of the domain of history – that are not defined clearly – and the difficulty of unequivocally visualizing historical concepts|
|Description:||Prangsma, M. E., Van Boxtel, C. A. M., Kanselaar, G., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009). Concrete and abstract visualizations in history learning tasks. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 371-387.|
|Appears in Collections:||1. LC: Publications and Preprints|
Files in This Item:
|Concrete and abstract visualizations in history - BJEP390.PDF||394.47 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.