Open Universiteit

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Effects of Conceptual Knowledge and Availability of Information Sources on Law Students Legal Reasoning
Authors: Nievelstein, Fleurie
Van Gog, Tamara
Boshuizen, Els
Prins, Frans
Keywords: conceptual knowledge
information sources
cognitive load
Issue Date: 21-Jun-2010
Abstract: Due to the complexity of the legal domain, reasoning about law cases is a very complex skill. For novices in law school, legal reasoning is even more complex because they have not yet acquired the conceptual knowledge needed for distilling the relevant information from cases, determining applicable rules, and searching for rules and exceptions in external information sources such as lawbooks. This study investigated the role of conceptual knowledge in solving legal cases when no information sources can be used. Under such ‘unsupported’ circumstances, novice and advanced students performed less well than domain experts, but even experts’ performance was rather low. The second question addressed was whether novices even benefit from the availability of information sources (i e., lawbook), because conceptual knowledge is prerequisite for effective use of such sources. Indeed availability of the lawbook positively affected performance only for advanced students but not for novice students. Implications for learning and instruction in the domain of law are discussed.
Description: Nievelstein, F., Van Gog, T., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Prins, F. J. (2010). Effects of Conceptual Knowledge and Availability of Information Sources on Law Students Legal Reasoning. Instructional Science, 38, 23-35. doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9076-3
Appears in Collections:1. LC: Publications and Preprints

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
NievelsteinEtAl2010InstrSc.pdf139.64 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons