Open Universiteit

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Superiority of collaborative learning with complex tasks: A research note on an alternative affective explanation
Authors: Kirschner, Femke
Paas, Fred
Kirschner, Paul A.
Keywords: Collaborative learning
Complex tasks
Learning efficiency
Cognitive architecture
Issue Date: 4-Nov-2010
Abstract: Kirschner, Paas, and Kirschner (2009c) used the theoretical framework of cognitive load to explain why the learning of a group of collaborating individuals was more efficient than that of individuals learning alone with high-complexity tasks but not with low-complexity tasks. The authors argued that collaboration circumvented the limitations of an individual’s working memory by creating an expanded cognitive capacity and by allowing for the distribution of cognitive load among group members. Inspired by research on efficacy, this study explored an alternative affective explanation of the results. By measuring the amount of mental effort learners expected to invest in working on a learning task before actually carrying out the task, this study showed that learners who had to collaboratively solve a high-complexity problem expected to invest less mental effort than learners who had to solve the problem alone. When confronted with low-complexity tasks, the expected amount of mental effort did not differ.
Description: Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2011). Superiority of collaborative learning with complex tasks: A research note on an alternative affective explanation. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 53-57. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.012
Appears in Collections:1. LC: Publications and Preprints

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Superiority of Collaborative Learning with Complex Tasks.pdf72.88 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons