Open Universiteit

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: The double dissociation of phenomenological and experimental methods in psychology; a case study
Authors: Van Hezewijk, René
Stam, Henderikus
Panhuysen, Geert
Keywords: Linschoten
history of psychology
Issue Date: 8-Dec-2010
Abstract: In the nineteen sixties The Utrecht School became famous for its contributions to phenomenological psychology (Van Hezewijk, Stam, & Panhuysen, 2002) (see also the preceding papers in this conference by H. Stam). In this paper we will try to present the view we arrived at in our research on how Linschoten saw the relation between phenomenology and experimental methods, and on how different publications (in different languages) had different effects on the development of—at least some—parts of psychology in different countries. Apart from—Johannes Linschoten—who has published work both in German, in Dutch and in English we focus on Amedeo Giorgi in the U.S. We will conclude that Linschoten has stimulated phenomenology in the Anglo-Saxon countries and has stimulated the experimental approach in The Netherlands.
Appears in Collections:1. PSY: publications and preprints

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Phenomenology and experimental methods_rev.pdf229.9 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.