Open Universiteit
   About DSpace Software Open Universiteit border=

DSpace at Open Universiteit >
f. Psychology >
1. PSY: publications and preprints >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1820/3429

Title: Sanctions and moral judgments: The moderating effect of sanction severity and trust in authorities
Authors: Mulder, Laetitia
Verboon, Peter
de Cremer, David
Keywords: Sanction Severity
Trust
Moral judgments
Issue Date: 5-Mar-2008
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Citation: European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 255–269 (2009)
Abstract: In order to induce people to follow rules, sanctions are often introduced. In this paper we argue for the importance of studying the positive influence of sanctioning systems on people’s moral convictions regarding the rule advocated by the sanction and of studying factors that moderate this influence. In three experiments we tested the influence of sanction severity and showed that severe sanctions evoke stronger moral judgments with regard to rule-breaking behavior and stronger social disapproval towards rule-breakers than mild sanctions. This was particularly the case when trust in authorities is high rather than low. Implications of these findings are discussed. Also, a framework is proposed to understand the possible circumstances that determine whether sanctions either increase or decrease moral norms.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1820/3429
Appears in Collections:1. PSY: publications and preprints

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Abstract.doc26.5 kBMicrosoft WordView/Open
View Statistics

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! Copyright © 2003 - 2010 Open Universiteit - Feedback