Open Universiteit
   About DSpace Software Open Universiteit border=

DSpace at Open Universiteit >
c. Learning & Cognition >
1. LC: Publications and Preprints >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1820/4260

Title: Object recognition testing: Methodological considerations on exploration and discrimination measures
Authors: Akkerman, Sven
Blokland, Arjan
Reneerkens, Olga
Van Goethem, Nick
Bollen, Eva
Gijselaers, Jérôme
Lieben, Cindy
Steinbusch, Harry
Prickaerts, Jos
Keywords: object
recogniton
test
methodology
exploration
discrimination
Issue Date: 3-May-2012
Abstract: The object recognition task (ORT) is a popular one-trial learning test for animals. In the current study, we investigated several methodological issues concerning the task. Data was pooled from 28 ORT studies, containing 731 male Wistar rats. We investigated the relationship between 3 common absolute- and relative discrimination measures, as well as their relation to exploratory activity. In this context, the effects of pre-experimental habituation, object familiarity, trial duration, retention interval and the amnesic drugs MK-801 and scopolamine were investigated. Our analyses showed that the ORT is very sensitive, capable of detecting subtle differences in memory (discrimination) and exploratory performance. As a consequence, it is susceptible to potential biases due to (injection) stress and side effects of drugs. Our data indicated that a minimum amount of exploration is required in the sample and test trial for stable significant discrimination performance. However, there was no relationship between the level of exploration in the sample trial and discrimination performance. In addition, the level of exploration in the test trial was positively related to the absolute discrimination measure, whereas this was not the case for relative discrimination measures, which correct for exploratory differences, making them more resistant to exploration biases. Animals appeared to remember object information over multiple test sessions. Therefore, when animals have encountered both objects in prior test sessions, the object preference observed in the test trial of 1 h retention intervals is probably due to a relative difference in familiarity between the objects in the test trial, rather than true novelty per se. Taken together, our findings suggest to take into consideration pre-experimental exposure (familiarization) to objects, habituation to treatment procedures, and the use of relative discrimination measures when using the ORT.
Description: Akkerman, S., Blokland, A., Reneerkens, O., Van Goethem, N. P., Bollen, E., Gijselaers, H. J. M., Lieben, C. K. J., Steinbusch, H., & Prickaerts, J. (2012). Object recognition testing: Methodological considerations on exploration and discrimination measures. Behavioural Rrain Research, 232, 335-347. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2012.03.022
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1820/4260
Appears in Collections:1. LC: Publications and Preprints

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
6 Preprint Akkerman 12 Object recognition testing methodology.pdf202.13 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
View Statistics

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Creative Commons

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! Copyright © 2003 - 2010 Open Universiteit - Feedback