Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Putting students on the path to learning: The case for fully guided instruction|
Kirschner, Paul A.
|Publisher:||American Federation of Teachers.|
|Abstract:||Disputes about the impact of instructional guidance during teaching have been ongoing for more than a half century. On one side of this argument are those who believe that all people—novices and experts alike—learn best when provided with instruction that contains unguided or partly guided segments. This is generally defined as instruction in which learners, rather than being presented with all essential information and asked to practice using it, must discover or construct some or all of the essential information for themselves. On the other side are those who believe that ideal learning environments for experts and novices differ: while experts often thrive without much guidance, nearly everyone else thrives when provided with full, explicit instructional guidance (and should not be asked to discover any essential content or skills)|
|Description:||Clark, R. E., Kirschner, P. A., & Sweller, J. (2012). Putting students on the path to learning: The case for fully guided instruction. American Educator, 36(1), 6-11.|
|Appears in Collections:||1. LC: Publications and Preprints|
Files in This Item:
|Putting students on the path - American Educator - Clark-Kirschner-Sweller.pdf||152.88 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.