Open Universiteit

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1820/5337
Title: Smartphone Apps for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training and Real Incident Support: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation Study
Authors: Kalz, Marco
Lenssen, Niklas
Felzen, Marco
Rossaint, Rolf
Tabuenca, Bernardo
Specht, Marcus
Skorning, Max
Keywords: EMuRgency
mobile learning
smartphone apps
mobile health
basic life support
cardiopulmonary resuscitation
CPR
mixed methods
Issue Date: 19-Mar-2014
Citation: Kalz, M., Lenssen, N., Felzen, M., Rossaint, R., Tabuenca, B., Specht, M., & Skorning, M. (2014). Smartphone Apps for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training and Real Incident Support: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(3), e89. doi:10.2196/jmir.2951
Abstract: Background: No systematic evaluation of smartphone/mobile apps for resuscitation training and real incident support is available to date. To provide medical, usability, and additional quality criteria for the development of apps, we conducted a mixed-methods sequential evaluation combining the perspective of medical experts and end-users. Objective: The study aims to assess the quality of current mobile apps for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training and real incident support from expert as well as end-user perspective. Methods: Two independent medical experts evaluated the medical content of CPR apps from the Google Play store and the Apple App store. The evaluation was based on pre-defined minimum medical content requirements according to current Basic Life Support (BLS) guidelines. In a second phase, non-medical end-users tested usability and appeal of the apps that had at least met the minimum requirements. Usability was assessed with the System Usability Scale (SUS); appeal was measured with the self-developed ReactionDeck toolkit. Results: Out of 61 apps, 46 were included in the experts’ evaluation. A consolidated list of 13 apps resulted for the following layperson evaluation. The interrater reliability was substantial (kappa=.61). Layperson end-users (n=14) had a high interrater reliability (intraclass correlation 1 [ICC1]=.83, P<.001, 95% CI 0.75-0.882 and ICC2=.79, P<.001, 95% CI 0.695-0.869). Their evaluation resulted in a list of 5 recommendable apps. Conclusions: Although several apps for resuscitation training and real incident support are available, very few are designed according to current BLS guidelines and offer an acceptable level of usability and hedonic quality for laypersons. The results of this study are intended to optimize the development of CPR mobile apps. The app ranking supports the informed selection of mobile apps for training situations and CPR campaigns as well as for real incident support.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1820/5337
Appears in Collections:1. LMedia: Publications and Preprints
1. TELI Publications, books and conference papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
JMIR-mkalz-cprapps-final-dspace.pdf2.55 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons