Open Universiteit

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Sorting Test, Tower Test, and BRIEF-SR do not predict school performance of healthy adolescents in preuniversity education
Authors: Boschloo, Annemarie
Krabbendam, Lydia
Aben, Aukje
De Groot, Renate
Jolles, Jelle
Keywords: Executive Function
cognitive flexibility
Inhibitory Control
working memory
socio-emotional development
prefrontal cortex (PFC)
cognitive development
Issue Date: Mar-2016
Publisher: Frontiers Media SA
Citation: Boschloo, A., Krabbendam, L., Aben, A., De Groot, R., & Jolles, J. (2016). Sorting Test, Tower Test, and BRIEF-SR do not predict school performance of healthy adolescents in preuniversity education. In Y. Moriguchi, P. D. Zelazo, & N. Chevalier, (Eds.), Development of Executive Function during Childhood (pp. 314-321). Lausanne: Frontiers Media. doi: 10.3389/978-2-88919-800-9
Abstract: Executive functions (EF) such as self-monitoring, planning, and organizing are known to develop through childhood and adolescence. They are of potential importance for learning and school performance. Earlier research into the relation between EF and school performance did not provide clear results possibly because confounding factors such as educational track, boy-girl differences, and parental education were not taken into account. The present study therefore investigated the relation between executive function tests and school performance in a highly controlled sample of 173 healthy adolescents aged 12–18. Only students in the pre-university educational track were used and the performance of boys was compared to that of girls. Results showed that there was no relation between the report marks obtained and the performance on executive function tests, notably the Sorting Test and the Tower Test of the Delis-Kaplan Executive Functions System (D-KEFS). Likewise, no relation was found between the report marks and the scores on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function—Self-Report Version (BRIEF-SR) after these were controlled for grade, sex, and level of parental education. The findings indicate that executive functioning as measured with widely used instruments such as the BRIEF-SR does not predict school performance of adolescents in preuniversity education any better than a student's grade, sex, and level of parental education.
ISBN: 978-2-88919-800-9
ISSN: 1664-8714
Appears in Collections:1. FEEEL Publications, books and conference papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Development_of_Executive_Function_during_Childhood.PDF32.91 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.