Open Universiteit

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1820/7093
Title: Of two contrasting philosophies that underpin openness in education and what that entails
Authors: Sloep, Peter
Schuwer, Robert
Keywords: MOOC
Open Educational Resources
Open University
Issue Date: 1-Oct-2016
Publisher: Peter Lang Publishing
Citation: Sloep, P. B., & Schuwer, R. (2016). Of two contrasting philosophies that underpin openness in education and what that entails. In M. Deimann & M. A. Peters (Eds.), The Philosophy and Theory of Open Education (pp. 83-100). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
Abstract: From the conclusion: The ultimate question is a normative one: Which way do we want that openness in education to go? That question concerns educational resources, open educational practices and what other forms the educational system may spawn. For ultimately, we as stakeholders, in the learning of our children and grandchildren, in the professional development and Bildung of ourselves, should get the educational systems that we want, including appropriate forms of openness therein. Every individual then should decide for herself or himself to what extent this requires education as a public good and to what extent education as a private good, that is, as a commodity subject to market forces. It should not come as a surprise that we side with the humanitarian elaboration of openness. Indeed, we feel that governments as guardians of the public space should actively get involved in promoting this kind of openness, indeed, much as Delors in 1996 advocated for education as a whole.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1820/7093
Appears in Collections:1. T2 Publications, books and conference papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Preprint versie 16-12-2015.pdf1.13 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons