Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Requirements ambiguousness pitfalls|
|Publisher:||Open Universiteit Nederland|
|Abstract:||Requirement documentation forms one of the important artefacts of the requirements engineering process. One of the downturns of using natural language in the context of requirement specifications is its natural tendency to ambiguousness. A simplified assessment on phrases that influence ambiguity has the potential to be beneficent for the analyst writing requirements documentation to stay away from the obvious pitfalls. The paper introduces the idea of a lightweight tactile check that annotates weak and strong phrases that are known to influence ambiguity. The performed assessment validated the ability to identify these phrases without any context analysis. The used finite dictionaries that contain the weak and strong phrases are based on previous work. The annotated phrases are evaluated by field experts and labeled to indicate if ambiguity is influenced and if the annotation is perceived as helpful to further reduce ambiguity. Finally discussing the quality of detection and the perceived helpfulness of annotating weak and strong phrases lead to the research conclusions and proposed future research.|
|Appears in Collections:||MSc Business Process Management and IT|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.