Open Universiteit

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1820/7609
Title: Concept mapping – an effective method for identifying diversity and congruity in cognitive style
Authors: Stoyanov, Slavi
Jablokow, Kathryn
Rosas, Scott
Wopereis, Iwan
Kirschner, Paul
Keywords: Group concept mapping
Cognitive style
Procrustes analysis
Issue Date: Feb-2017
Publisher: Elsevier Evaluation and Program Planning
Citation: Stoyanov, S., Jablokow, K., Rosas, S., Wopereis, I., & Kirschner, P. (2017). Concept mapping – an effective method for identifying diversity and congruity in cognitive style. Evaluation and Program Planning. Concept Mapping at 25 (special issue, 60, 238-244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.08.015
Abstract: This paper investigates the effects of cognitive style for decision making on the behavior of participants in different phases of the group concept mapping process (GCM). It is argued that cognitive style should be included directly in the coordination of the GCM process and not simply considered as yet another demographic variable. The cognitive styles were identified using the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory, which locates each person’s style on a continuum ranging from very adaptive to very innovative. Cognitive style could explain diversity in the participants’ behavior in different phases of the GCM process. At the same time, the concept map as a group’s common cognitive construct can consolidate individual differences and serves as a tool for managing diversity in groups of participants. Some of the results were that: (a) the more adaptive participants generated ideas that fit to a particular, well-established and consensually agreed paradigm, frame of reference, theory or practice; (b) the more innovative participants produced ideas that were more general in scope and required changing a settled structure (paradigm, frame of reference, theory or practice); and (c) the empirical comparison of the map configurations through Procrustes analysis indicated a strong dissimilarity between cognitive styles.
Description: This is a pre-print version of the paper published in Evaluation and Program Planning, 2017, 60
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1820/7609
Appears in Collections:1. TELI Publications, books and conference papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
stoyanov et al_GCM_cognitive style_accepted.pdf223.6 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons