Open Universiteit

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1820/8942
Title: A national stakeholder consensus study of challenges and priorities for clinical learning environments in postgraduate medical education
Authors: Kilty, Caroline
Wiese, Anel
Bergin, Colm
Flood, Patrick
Fu, Na
Horgan, Mary
Higgins, Agnes
Maher, Bridget
O’Kane, Grainne
Prihodova, Lucia
Slattery, Dubhfeasa
Stoyanov, Slavi
Bennett, Deirdre
Keywords: Graduate medical education
Postgraduate medical education
Clinical learning environment
Group Concept Mapping
Issue Date: Nov-2017
Publisher: Springer Nature/BMC
Citation: Kilty, C., Wiese, A., Bergin, C., Flood, P., Fu, N., Horgan, M., Higgins, A., Maher, B., O’Kane, G., Prihodova, L., Slattery, D., Stoyanov, S., & Bennett, D. (2017). A national stakeholder consensus study of challenges and priorities for clinical learning environments in postgraduate medical education. BMC Medical Education, 17, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1065-2
Abstract: Background: High quality clinical learning environments (CLE) are critical to postgraduate medical education (PGME). The understaffed and overcrowded environments in which many residents work present a significant challenge to learning. The purpose of this study was to develop a national expert group consensus amongst stakeholders in PGME to; (i) identify important barriers and facilitators of learning in CLEs and (ii) indicate priority areas for improvement. Our objective was to provide information to focus efforts to provide high quality CLEs. Methods: Group Concept Mapping (GCM) is an integrated mixed methods approach to generating expert group consensus. A multi-disciplinary group of experts were invited to participate in the GCM process via an online platform. Multi-dimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis were used to analyse participant inputs in regard to barriers, facilitators and priorities. Results: Participants identified facilitators and barriers in ten domains within clinical learning environments. Domains rated most important were those which related to residents’ connection to and engagement with more senior doctors. Organisation and conditions of work and Time to learn with senior doctors during patient care were rated as the most difficult areas in which to make improvements. Conclusions: High quality PGME requires that residents engage and connect with senior doctors during patient care, and that they are valued and supported both as learners and service providers. Academic medicine and health service managers must work together to protect these elements of CLEs, which not only shape learning, but impact quality of care and patient safety.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1820/8942
Appears in Collections:1. TELI Publications, books and conference papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Challenges and priorities medical education GCM.pdf520.7 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons