Open Universiteit

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Community of inquiry: Social presence revisited
Authors: Kreijns, Karel
Van Acker, Frederik
Vermeulen, Marjan
Van Buuren, Hans
Keywords: social presence
community of practice
social space
computer-supported collaborative learning
Issue Date: 2014
Publisher: E-Learning and Digital Media
Citation: Kreijns, K., Van Acker, F., Vermeulen, M., Van Buuren, H. (2014). Community of inquiry: Social presence revisited [Special Issue: Inquiry into “Communities of Inquiry:” Knowledge, Communication, Presence, Community]. E-Learning and Digital Media, 11(1), 5–18. doi: 10.2304/elea.2014.11.1.5
Abstract: Social presence is a construct that has attracted the attention of many educational scholars involved in online collaborative learning settings wherein all the dialogue is happening through text-based asynchronous and synchronous communication channels. The social presence of the learning group members is associated with the degree of participation and social interaction amongst them and, as such, is therefore considered a critical variable for learning. The Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework defines social presence as the ability to project one’s personal identity in the online community so that she or he is perceived as a ‘real’ person and/or as progressing through the phases 1) acquiring a social identity, 2) having purposeful communication, and 3) building relationships. However, the CoI social presence construct as well as its operationalization still leave many issues open. In this article, we disentangle the original social presence construct of Short, Williams, and Christie (1976) and conclude that it actually represents two constructs, namely 1) ‘social presence’ (degree of ‘realness’ of the other in the communication), and 2) social space (degree to which social interpersonal relationships are salient). We identify that social presence in the CoI model is actually integrating both constructs but with an emphasis on social space. Extending the CoI framework by making a distinction between social presence and social space is to the benefit of the the CoI model as the attention to its design and implementation can now be more precise. In addition, as social presence and social space are both progressive and developmental in nature, it fits the underlying philosophy of the CoI framework that embraces this dynamic characteristic.
Appears in Collections:1. T2 Publications, books and conference papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Kreijns et al ELEA - 2014.pdf976.5 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.