Open Universiteit

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1820/9270
Title: Reflection: A Socratic approach
Authors: Van Seggelen-Damen, Inge
Van Hezewijk, René
Helsdingen, Anne
Wopereis, Iwan
Keywords: Coupled system
Linschoten
reflection
reflective practice
Socratic dialogue
Issue Date: 24-Oct-2017
Publisher: SAGE
Citation: Van Seggelen-Damen, I. C. M., Van Hezewijk, R., Helsdingen, A. S., & Wopereis, I. G. J. H. (2017). Reflection: A Socratic approach. Theory & Psychology, 27, 793-814. doi:10.1177/0959354317736388
Abstract: Reflection is a fuzzy concept. In this article we reveal the paradoxes involved in studying the nature of reflection. Whereas some scholars emphasize its discursive nature, we go further and underline its resemblance to the self-biased dialogue Socrates had with the slave in Plato’s Meno. The individual and internal nature of the reflection process creates difficulty for studying it validly and reliably. We focus on methodological issues and use Hans Linschoten’s view of coupled systems to identify, analyze, and interpret empirical research on reflection. We argue that researchers and research participants can take on roles in several possible system couplings. Depending on who controls the manipulation of the stimulus, who controls the measuring instrument, who interprets the measurement and the response, different types of research questions can be answered. We conclude that reflection may be validly studied by combining different couplings of experimenter, manipulation, stimulus, participant, measurement, and response.
Description: Open access
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1820/9270
Appears in Collections:1. FEEEL Publications, books and conference papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Reflection-A Socratic Approach-Preprint-TaP-2017.pdf1.27 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons